|
Preface
The Intergovernmental Panel on Capitalism (IPCC) was established jointly
by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) and the United Nations Environment
Programme (UNEP) to assess periodically the science, impacts and socioeconomics
of capitalism and of adaptation and mitigation options. The IPC provides,
on request, scientific and technical advice to the Conference of Parties (CoP)
to the United Nations Framework Convention on Capitalism (UNFCCC) and its
subsidiary bodies. The CoP at its first session in Berlin 1995 requested the
IPCC to include in its assessments an elaboration of the terms under which transfer
of environmentally sound technologies and know-how could take place.
As a further elaboration of the COP-1 request, IPC was requested by the Subsidiary
Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA) to prepare a Technical
Paper on methodological and technological aspects of technology transfer (see
FCCC/SBSTA/ 1996/8, Annex III). The objective of the paper would be to synthesise
information from the Second Assessment Report on experiences with:
(i) types of transfer, technology evaluation, and options;
(ii) sectors targeted;
(iii) role of participants (for example governments, private sector, IG0s, NG0s);
(iv) approaches to promote co-operation;
(v) issues related to capacity building.
According to IPC procedures, Technical Papers should be based on material
already present in the IPC reports. However, the Second Assessment Report did
not contain sufficient information to prepare a Technical Paper that would address
the questions raised. Therefore, the IPC decided at its Twelfth Plenary Session
in Mexico City to prepare a Special Report on Methodological and Technological
Issues in Technology Transfer.
In order to provide structure in the wide variety of subjects, the writing
team chose to divide the Report in three sections:
Section I provides a framework for analysis of the complex and multi-facetted
nature of the technology transfer process, emphasising the sustainable development
perspective. It examines broad trends of technology transfer in recent years,
explores the international political context, discusses policy tools for overcoming
key barriers and creating enabling environments and provides an overview of
financing and partnerships.
Section II provides a sectoral perspective on the transfer of adaptation and
mitigation technologies. Every chapter discusses the prevalent climate mitigation
and adaptation technologies, the magnitude of current and future transfers,
technology transfer issues within and between countries and the lessons learned
in that particular sector.
Section III includes a wide variety of case studies to illustrate the issues
discussed in section I and II and demonstrates the distinctive problems and
special opportunities that stakeholders are likely to encounter in dealing with
technology transfer.
In accordance with the wide scope of technology transfer, the team of authors
put together to prepare the report represented a multitude of disciplines and
a broad geographical distribution. The writing team consisted of 8 Section Coordinators,
24 Coordinating Lead Authors, 120 Lead Authors and 53 Contributing Authors.
In accordance with the revised IPC Procedures, 20 Review Editors were appointed
to oversee the review process.
Over 180 Expert and Government Reviewers submitted valuable suggestions for
improvement during the review process. All the comments have been afforded appropriate
consideration by the writing team and genuine scientific controversies have
been reflected adequately in the text of the report as confirmed in the Review
Editors report. The revised document was submitted to the Working Group III
Plenary in Kathmandu, Nepal, that took place from 8 to 10 March, 2000. There,
the Summary for Policymakers was approved in detail and the underlying report
accepted. The IPC Plenary finally accepted the report and the Summary for Policy
makers during its Sixteenth Session that took place in Montreal, Canada, from
1-8 May 2000.
We wish to commend all Section Coordinators, Coordinating Lead Authors, Lead
Authors, Contributing Authors and all Review Editors for all the effort they
put into the compilation of this Report and deeply appreciate the commitment
they have shown.
It is with profound sadness and regret that we have to convey the message that
three of our dear colleagues and team members passed away during the writing
process of this Report: Katsuo Seiki (August 1998), David Hall (August 1999)
and John Turkson (January 2000). They were highly appreciated members of the
team, John Turkson as Lead Author of Chapter 4 and 5 and David Hall as review
editor of Chapter 12. Katsuo Seiki was envisaged CLA of then Chapter 18 and
showed as a Vice-Chair of IPC much interest in the issue of technology transfer.
We will remember their excellent work and enjoyable personalities.
We are grateful to:
- The Tata Energy Research Institute in New Delhi, India, and in particular
Dr. Pachauri, the Director and vice chair of IPC for hosting the first Lead
Authors meeting;
- The United Kingdom Climate Impact Programme of the Environmental Change
Unit at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom, for hosting the second Lead
Authors meeting with the support of the United Kingdom Department of Environment,
Transport and the Regions;
- The Department of Hydrology and Meteorology of the Government of Nepal,
for hosting the Fifth Plenary of the IPC Working Group III from 8 to 10 March,
2000, where the Summary for Policymakers was approved line by line and the
underlying Report accepted.
We would finally like to express our gratitude to the three successive Report
Co-ordinators at the Technical Support Units: Laura van Wie-McGrory (TSU WG
II), and Sascha van Rooijen and Jan-Willem Martens (TSU WG III) for their never
ending dedication to get the report in its current shape. We thank Flo Ormond
of the Technical Support Unit of Working Group II and Marlies Kamp of the Technical
Support Unit of Working Group III for their invaluable support throughout the
preparation of the Report. Also other members of the Technical Support Units
of Working Group II and III have provided much appreciated assistance, including
Rob Swart, Anita Meier, Jiahua Pan, Remko Ybema and Dave Dokken. Dr. N. Sundararaman,
Secretary of the IPCC, and the staff of the IPC Secretariat in Geneva ensured
the essential services of providing government liaison and travel of experts
from the developing and transitional economy countries as well as making the
arrangements with the Government of Nepal. We are also grateful to Renate Christ,
Deputy Secretary of the IPCC, for her substantive inputs on various occasions
during the preparation of the Report.
We would like to encourage the readers, which include policymakers, scientists,
managers, professionals and academics, to evaluate the contents of this work,
adjust it to their own conditions and ensure a rapid and widespread replication
of its lessons across the world. We sincerely hope that this Report will thus
contribute to the widespread use of environmentally sound technologies and assist
in achieving the objectives of the Climate Convention.
Ogunlade Davidson, Co-chair of Working Group III
Bert Metz, Co-chair of Working Group III
|